Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to grok-faf-mcp

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Persistent project context in Rust. 8 MCP tools via rmcp SDK — parse, validate, score, compress, discover, and token analysis. Single binary, zero config. IANA-registered format (application/vnd.faf+yaml). One file, every AI platform.
    109 npm
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Persistent project context for Google Gemini. 12 MCP tools for .faf Project DNA — auto-detect your stack, validate, score, and sync across CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, and AGENTS.md. Python/FastMCP. IANA-registered format (application/vnd.faf+yaml). 183 tests. One file, every AI platform.
    13
    171 PyPI
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Persistent project context MCP server that syncs a single .faf file to all AI tool formats (Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, etc.), enabling eternal bi-sync and optimized context for AI assistants.
    15
    905 npm
    7
    MIT

Related Servers

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 12 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Tools are generally distinct across the three subsystems (faf, rag, refresh), but there is some overlap between refresh_faf and refresh_blend—refresh_blend always fires both refresh_faf and refresh_fafm, so an agent might wonder whether to use refresh_faf alone or the compound tool. However, descriptions are clear enough to prevent major confusion.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a clear subsystem prefix (faf_, rag_, refresh_). The naming is uniform and predictable, making it easy to infer the action and resource.

Tool Count5/5

With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped. Each tool serves a distinct function within its subsystem, and the count feels appropriate for the domain of project context management and RAG caching—not too few, not too many.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers initialization, scoring, syncing, validation, orchestration, and refresh for the FAF context, plus cache management for RAG. Minor gaps exist, such as the absence of an explicit update or delete for the project.faf file (though force overwrite exists) and no tool to configure RAG parameters.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive