create-task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It merely states 'Create a new task' without mentioning side effects, return values, authentication needs, or any constraints beyond the schema. This is insufficient for a mutation operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loaded, containing no unnecessary words. However, it could be slightly expanded to include behavioral context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there are many sibling tools and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the outcome of the operation (e.g., does it return the created task?), nor does it provide any usage context. For a simple create tool, more details about return behavior or prerequisites would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all parameters (name, columnId, description), so the baseline is 3. The description 'Create a new task on the board' does not add extra semantic meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so a score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'create' and the resource 'a new task on the board', which clearly indicates the tool's function. However, it does not differentiate it from sibling tools like 'create-task-with-subtasks' or 'add-subtask', which have overlapping purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings. For example, it does not clarify when to choose 'create-task' over 'create-task-with-subtasks' or 'add-subtask', leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.