KanbanFlow MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to KanbanFlow MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to read and drive a local-first Kanban board for issue tracking, allowing them to list, create, update, and resolve issues from Claude Code sessions.7 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage Kanban tasks, boards, teams, and checklists via natural language, with full CRUD operations and live updates.85 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to read and manage tasks, boards, subtasks, labels, dates, comments, time tracking, and more across multiple KanbanFlow boards through a single server. Supports a board_name parameter that resolves the correct per-board API token from a config file, with full coverage of KanbanFlow's REST API.327 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage kanban boards with tasks, including creating boards, items, moving between columns, and searching.81MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to manage a terminal-based Kanban board with tools for task CRUD, moving, completing, archiving, and board initialization and export/import.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage a local-first Kanban board with Azure DevOps-style workflow rules, including task creation, status updates, subtask breakdown, full-text search, daily summaries, and next-task suggestions.-
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool targets a specific action on a distinct resource (tasks, comments, labels, subtasks, board). Potential overlaps like add-subtask/add-subtasks and create-task/create-task-with-subtasks are clearly distinguished by complexity. The generic update-task is distinct from specific updates due to scope.
All tool names follow a consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., add-comment, get-task-details). Verbs are chosen appropriately and the structure is uniform across all 16 tools.
With 16 tools, the server covers a broad range of Kanban operations without being overwhelming. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is well-suited for a board management domain.
The tool set lacks essential operations: no delete for tasks, comments, labels, or subtasks, and no ability to move tasks between columns. This creates significant gaps in completing typical Kanban workflows.