Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to KanbanFlow MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to read and drive a local-first Kanban board for issue tracking, allowing them to list, create, update, and resolve issues from Claude Code sessions.
      7 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage Kanban tasks, boards, teams, and checklists via natural language, with full CRUD operations and live updates.
      85 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to read and manage tasks, boards, subtasks, labels, dates, comments, time tracking, and more across multiple KanbanFlow boards through a single server. Supports a board_name parameter that resolves the correct per-board API token from a config file, with full coverage of KanbanFlow's REST API.
      32
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage kanban boards with tasks, including creating boards, items, moving between columns, and searching.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to manage a terminal-based Kanban board with tools for task CRUD, moving, completing, archiving, and board initialization and export/import.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage a local-first Kanban board with Azure DevOps-style workflow rules, including task creation, status updates, subtask breakdown, full-text search, daily summaries, and next-task suggestions.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a specific action on a distinct resource (tasks, comments, labels, subtasks, board). Potential overlaps like add-subtask/add-subtasks and create-task/create-task-with-subtasks are clearly distinguished by complexity. The generic update-task is distinct from specific updates due to scope.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., add-comment, get-task-details). Verbs are chosen appropriately and the structure is uniform across all 16 tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 16 tools, the server covers a broad range of Kanban operations without being overwhelming. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is well-suited for a board management domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks essential operations: no delete for tasks, comments, labels, or subtasks, and no ability to move tasks between columns. This creates significant gaps in completing typical Kanban workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues