Skip to main content
Glama
WebitroHQ

minecraft-structure-mcp

by WebitroHQ
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to minecraft-structure-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • blockwright

      ThatHunky
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to build and manage Minecraft structures on a live server via RCON, with preview, read-back, and undo capabilities.
      16
      67 npm
      MIT

    • Buildup

      SNX830
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to create complete, Teardown-ready multi-part .vox voxel models with material palette compatibility, previews, manifests, and XML skeletons so they can write coherent mod files.
      22
      1
      MIT

    • Blockbench MCP

      achmadawdi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Blockbench for Minecraft 3D modeling, including project creation, cube placement, UV layout, and texture painting.
      GPL 3.0

    • Aldeano Build MCP

      Aldeanoo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perceive, navigate, interact with, and build inside Minecraft through typed, bounded operations, including deterministic blueprints, verified builds, repair, and creative-mode flight or teleport. Runs as a provider-neutral MCP server or an interactive dev shell, exposing movement, voxel manipulation, inventory, chat, and diagnostics tools.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct roles: lifecycle (new/open/save/list/info/resize), editing (set_blocks/fill/replace_blocks/copy_region/set_block_nbt), and inspection (layer_text/render/render_layer). The only mild overlap is between set_blocks, fill (replace mode), and replace_blocks, but the descriptions clarify explicit-list vs parametric-box vs state-substitution semantics.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is verb_noun or verb_structure (new_structure, open_structure, save_structure, resize_structure, set_blocks, replace_blocks, copy_region, set_block_nbt). Minor deviations exist (structure_info and layer_text are noun-first; fill, undo, render are bare verbs), but everything remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Fifteen tools sit at the top of the well-scoped range and each maps to a real operation in a structure-editing workflow. Nothing feels redundant or padded; the inspection tools in particular earn their place as separate concerns.

    Completeness4/5

    CRUD-style lifecycle (new/open/save/list/info/resize), editing, undo, NBT, and visualization are all covered with no dead ends. Notable gaps are structure-level transformations (rotate/mirror) and file deletion, which an agent would have to work around manually.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources