Skip to main content
Glama
Wang-JQ77

deepseek-litresearch

by Wang-JQ77
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to deepseek-litresearch

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Paper Pilot

      aytzey
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Your AI's research copilot. Searches 6 academic databases, downloads real PDFs, reads them cover to cover, extracts evidence, renders figures, syncs to Zotero.
      16
      13
      MIT

    • traceable-research-mcp

      jush-website
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables traceable scholarly literature reviews using free APIs, generating reports where every claim links to evidence IDs.
      MIT

    • kiro-research-mcp

      thejusdutt
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Implements Anthropic's multi-agent research methodology with tools for iterative web search, source quality scoring, citation tracking, and quality-tiered report generation.
      3 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have overlapping boundaries: deep_research, plan_research, execute_research, create_research_job, and run_research_job all serve research initiation/execution with subtle workflow differences. While descriptions are detailed, an agent can easily misselect between these overlapping entry points, especially when deciding between one-shot deep_research and the plan/execute split.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern such as search_literature, read_paper, list_research_jobs, and set_settings. The exceptions are scihub and ezproxy, which are bare product-style names, and deep_research, which reads more like an adjective_noun phrase than a verb-driven action.

    Tool Count3/5

    The listed surface exposes around 20 tools, which falls into the heavy range and feels over-scoped for a literature research server. The research-job lifecycle alone accounts for roughly ten tools, several of which duplicate the same conceptual operation.

    Completeness4/5

    The set provides strong domain coverage: multi-source search, full-text reading, citation chaining, settings management, connectivity diagnostics, and job persistence with CRUD operations. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated update endpoint for modifying a saved job, but plan_override and settings tools provide workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources