Skip to main content
Glama
WYRE-AI

QuickBooks Online MCP Server

by WYRE-AI
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

qbo_terms_update

Update an existing QuickBooks term by changing only the provided fields. Requires the term ID and current SyncToken to modify name, active status, due days, or discount settings.

Instructions

Sparse-update an existing Term record. Only provided fields are changed; Id and SyncToken are required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
NameYesTerm name, e.g. "Net 30"
ActiveNoWhether the term is active
termIdYesThe Term ID to update
DueDaysNoNumber of days from invoice date to due date
SyncTokenYesCurrent SyncToken of the record (required by QBO for sparse updates; fetch the record first to obtain it)
DiscountDaysNoDays within which the discount applies
DiscountPercentNoEarly-payment discount percent (for 2/10 Net 30 style terms)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.4.4

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only mentions sparse-update behavior and required fields. Lacks disclosure on side effects, authorization, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is clear and to the point. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema; description does not mention return value or expected response. For a mutation tool, this is a gap, but it effectively differentiates from siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptive parameter descriptions. Description adds little beyond stating required fields, which is already in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'sparse-update an existing Term record', using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create, get, list, and search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description mentions only provided fields are changed and required fields, providing context for usage. However, no explicit when-not or alternatives are stated, though sibling names imply differentiation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools