umbrella_api_usage_requests

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden. It only states that the output is a detailed log over a date range; it does not mention pagination, ordering, limits, output shape, or whether this is a read-only operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence with no filler, and it front-loads the key resource and date-range scope. However, its brevity leaves little room for context that would help an agent distinguish it from similar siblings.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and no output schema, the agent has only this sentence plus the parameter schema. The description does not explain what the detailed log contains, how it differs from related API usage tools, or what the caller should expect in the response, making it incomplete for confident invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents both 'from' and 'to' as date range endpoints with YYYY-MM-DD format, so the description adds no additional meaning. With 100% schema coverage, the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States that the tool returns a detailed API request log over a date range, clearly identifying the resource and the required date parameters. It does not use an explicit verb and does not directly contrast with siblings like umbrella_api_usage_summary or umbrella_api_usage_responses, though 'detailed' hints at differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus umbrella_api_usage_summary, umbrella_api_usage_responses, or umbrella_api_usage_keys. The agent must infer selection solely from the tool name and the single-sentence description, with no exclusions or alternatives mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.