Skip to main content
Glama

updateTask

Update an existing task's properties such as assignees, due date, priority, and status. Modify task details to reflect current project requirements.

Instructions

Update an existing task. Modify the properties of an existing task.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
taskIdYesThe ID of the task to update
taskRequestYesThe task data to update
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, but the description adds no extra behavioral context such as side effects, permissions required, or notification behavior. For a mutation tool, more transparency is expected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but contains redundant sentences ('Update an existing task' and 'Modify the properties of an existing task' say nearly the same thing). It is concise but could be more efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the tool's complexity (nested objects, many properties in taskRequest), the description is minimal and does not cover return values, partial updates, or typical use cases. Output schema is absent, increasing the need for description detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description does not add additional meaning beyond what is in the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the purpose: 'Update an existing task. Modify the properties of an existing task.' It specifies the verb (update) and resource (task), and distinguishes from sibling tools like createTask or deleteTask.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to update vs create), nor does it mention any prerequisites or context for using it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Vizioz/Teamwork-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server