A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that connects to the Teamwork API, providing tools to manage projects, tasks, companies, people, time entries, and reports, with built-in competitive intelligence capabilities.
14 npm
MIT
Teamwork MCP
by Vizioz
Related Servers
Alternatives to Teamwork MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Taskboi task management, enabling project and task operations with recurrence and priority support via the Taskboi API.164 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with ClickUp via its REST API, providing tools to manage tasks, search work, and explore workspace structure.633 npmMIT
- MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with the Tweek API to manage calendars, tasks, and custom colors. It enables users to perform full task CRUD operations, list accessible calendars, and fetch color preferences through secure authentication.1MIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 36 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Tool purposes are mostly clear, but several overlap: getProjectPerson/getProjectPeople/getPersonById, getTasks/getTasksByProjectId/getTasksByTaskListId, and the reporting tools (getProjectsPeopleMetricsPerformance, getProjectsReportingUserTaskCompletion, getProjectsPeopleUtilization) have similar names and data targets. Users need to read descriptions carefully to choose the right one.
Naming Consistency4/5
The get/create/update/delete verb pattern is consistent across projects, tasks, people, and companies. Some names are awkward or verbose (getProjectPerson, getTasksMetricsComplete, getProjectsReportingUserTaskCompletion), but the overall convention is predictable and readable.
Tool Count3/5
36 tools is on the heavy sidecka, and several retrieval/reporting endpoints overlap and could be consolidated. However, the server spans multiple related domains (projects, tasks, people, companies, time, reports), so the large count is somewhat justified by the broad scope.
Completeness3/5
Tasks and companies have solid CRUD coverage, but there are notable gaps: no project update/delete, no task list management, no person creation, and time entries can be retrieved but not created or modified. Common workflows are covered, but agents will hit dead ends for lifecycle operations.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues