account_unmute
Restore visibility of a muted account's posts and notifications by unmuting them using their account ID.
Instructions
Unmute an account.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes | Numeric account ID to unmute. |
Restore visibility of a muted account's posts and notifications by unmuting them using their account ID.
Unmute an account.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes | Numeric account ID to unmute. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description only states 'Unmute an account.' It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, permission requirements, or state changes beyond the basic action, which is insufficient for full transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. While efficient, it could be slightly more informative without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks mention of the corresponding mute action or any prerequisites, leaving a gap in completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, with a single required parameter 'account_id' described as 'Numeric account ID to unmute.' The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Unmute an account.' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly indicating the action on an account. It distinguishes well from siblings like account_mute, account_block, and account_follow.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as account_unblock or account_unfollow. There is no mention of context or exclusions, leaving the agent without decision-making support.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/VitexSoftware/mastodon-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server