account_follow
Subscribe to updates from a Mastodon account by supplying its numeric ID.
Instructions
Follow an account.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes | Numeric account ID to follow. |
Subscribe to updates from a Mastodon account by supplying its numeric ID.
Follow an account.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes | Numeric account ID to follow. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states 'Follow an account' without disclosing any behavioral traits (e.g., whether it sends a follow request, requires authorization, or triggers notifications).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short but under-specified; lacks sufficient information to be useful beyond stating the obvious.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing context on response, prerequisites, or effects; not sufficient for a tool with one parameter and no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already describes account_id as 'Numeric account ID to follow.' The description adds no further meaning, so baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the verb 'Follow' and the resource 'account', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like account_block or account_mute.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., follow_request_authorize for private accounts) or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/VitexSoftware/mastodon-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server