Skip to main content
Glama
VisualSentinel

Visual Sentinel MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Visual Sentinel MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Uptime monitoring for websites, APIs, SSL certificates, domain expiry, ping and TCP/UDP ports. 15 tools to list, create, pause and delete monitors, pull incident timelines with error codes, and read hourly or daily uptime and response-time statistics.
      15
      60 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive tools for real-time DNS queries across 53 record types, global propagation checks, and SSL certificate analysis. It also enables domain security scans for SPF/DKIM/DMARC configurations and HTTP uptime monitoring.
      8
      47 npm
      23
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides live infrastructure monitoring for AI agents, including domain health checks, MCP server security posture, email blacklists, broken-link scans, and cloud vendor status. No signup or API key needed for public tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Official Hyperping MCP server for uptime, API, cron and server monitoring. 26 tools covering monitors, outages and timelines, uptime, response time, MTTR and MTTA, on-call schedules and escalation policies, over a remote Streamable HTTP endpoint with Bearer token auth and no install.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: alerts, incidents, monitors, servers, status pages, and public checks (DNS, SSL, speed, health). Even similar tools like vs_website_check and vs_speed_test have clearly differentiated scopes (quick health vs. detailed performance).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools follow a consistent vs_{resource}_{action} pattern (e.g., vs_alerts_list, vs_monitors_create) with snake_case. Slight inconsistencies: vs_health is just a noun, and vs_monitors_uptime uses a noun instead of a verb, but overall pattern is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    16 tools is well within the expected range for a monitoring service. Each tool serves a distinct purpose covering alerts, incidents, monitors, servers, status pages, and public utilities. No tool feels extraneous or redundant.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers core monitoring workflows (list, get, create monitors; list and get incidents; list and acknowledge alerts) but lacks update and delete operations for monitors and incidents. The surface feels slightly incomplete for full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues