Skip to main content
Glama
VisionAIrySE

XFMS

by VisionAIrySE
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to XFMS

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • FreeModel MCP

      yummy342
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Routes tasks to the optimal AI model based on task type and benchmark scores across 25+ platforms. Automatically selects the best model for coding, reasoning, writing, and more using public benchmark data.
      5
      26 npm
      1
      MIT

    • jev-model-router

      Mandrilsquad1441
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables selecting the best AI model and reasoning effort for any task by analyzing task requirements and live pricing, balancing intelligence, speed, and cost. Provides model recommendations, comparisons, and routing status through MCP tools.
      62 npm
      2
      MIT

    • ai-compass

      kalraakshit042
      A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Describe your AI use case in plain English, get ranked model recommendations with cost estimates and tradeoff reasoning. Covers 62 models across 29 providers. Available as a web app (BYOK + guest tier) and as an MCP server for Claude Desktop and Cursor — same recommendation engine, two interfaces.
      1
      1
      MIT

    • Artificial Analysis MCP Server

      davidhariri
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to real-time LLM pricing, speed metrics, and performance benchmarks for over 300 models from Artificial Analysis. It enables users to list, filter, and compare models based on costs, tokens per second, and intelligence indices.
      2
      35 npm
      9
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: discover explains quality dimensions, pick returns a single best, rank returns a shortlist, benchmark tests engine-chosen candidates, and compare tests user-specified candidates. There is no overlap; even the two A/B testing tools are cleanly separated by candidate source (engine vs. user).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names are single-word verbs in lowercase (rank, pick, discover, benchmark, compare), following a consistent imperative style. The pattern is uniform and predictable, with no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of LLM selection and evaluation. Each tool contributes a distinct step in the workflow without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full intended workflow: discover criteria, pick or rank, then benchmark engine picks or compare user picks. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources