Skip to main content
Glama
VetCoders

automator-mcp

by VetCoders
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to automator-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • macos-mcp

      CursorTouch
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that bridges AI agents and macOS, enabling automation of file navigation, application control, UI interaction, browser automation, and system operations.
      184
      MIT

    • cua-mac

      ashish200729
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      macOS MCP server that enables AI agents to directly control the host OS, including mouse, keyboard, windows, files, and accessibility automation for computer-use workflows.
      1
      -

    • macos-control-mcp

      vito1317
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI to fully control macOS — mouse, keyboard, terminal, screenshots, window management, UI element detection, and provides AI-optimized information reporting.
      36
      17 npm
      MIT

    • macinput

      Sigma711
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for macOS that enables AI agents to control the desktop GUI through keyboard input, mouse actions, and screen captures. It provides stable low-level primitives for UI automation and agent-driven desktop workflows.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools have some clear distinctions, such as create_workflow vs. run_applescript, but there is notable overlap between quick_action, system_automation, and the execution tools (run_applescript, run_jxa). An agent might struggle to choose between quick_action and system_automation for general tasks, as their purposes are not sharply differentiated in the descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_workflow, list_actions, run_applescript), which aids readability. However, quick_action deviates slightly by using an adjective-noun format, breaking the pattern and causing minor inconsistency in the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for automation tasks on macOS, covering workflow creation, action listing, and various execution methods. The count is appropriate, avoiding bloat while providing essential functionality for the domain without feeling thin or excessive.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover key areas like workflow creation and script execution, but there are notable gaps in the automation lifecycle. For example, there are no tools for managing or deleting workflows, updating actions, or handling errors, which could limit agent effectiveness in more complex automation scenarios.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources