enable_proxy_host
Enable a proxy host in Nginx Proxy Manager by its ID to resume traffic forwarding and access control.
Instructions
Enable a proxy host
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| host_id | Yes | The ID of the proxy host to enable |
Enable a proxy host in Nginx Proxy Manager by its ID to resume traffic forwarding and access control.
Enable a proxy host
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| host_id | Yes | The ID of the proxy host to enable |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only states the basic function. It does not disclose whether the operation is reversible, requires existing host, or triggers side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundant information, perfectly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and description is too minimal to fully inform an agent. Lacks details on success criteria and postconditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters, so description adds no new meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Enable a proxy host' clearly indicates the action and resource, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like enable_dead_host or enable_redirection_host.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as disable_proxy_host. No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/VeryBigSad/nginx-proxy-manager-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server