delete_user
Delete a user account by providing the user's unique ID.
Instructions
Delete a user by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | The ID of the user to delete |
Delete a user account by providing the user's unique ID.
Delete a user by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | The ID of the user to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states the action but does not disclose destructive nature, cascading effects, authentication needs, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short, which is concise but omits helpful context. It is front-loaded with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and annotations, the description is insufficient for safe usage. It lacks details on return values, error states, and safety checks.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter description. Baseline score is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Delete a user by ID', specifying both the action and the resource. It naturally distinguishes from sibling tools like create_user, get_user, and update_user.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites (e.g., user existence), or error handling.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/VeryBigSad/nginx-proxy-manager-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server