Get a Verdict rating

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes return values (letter grade, composite score, metadata) and input format. No annotations provided, so description carries burden. Lacks disclosure of rate limits, auth needs, or side effects, but adequate for a simple read tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences: first states purpose and output, second shows example. No wasted words, front-loaded key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description explains return values. Input schema well-documented. Lacks usage guidance against siblings, but otherwise complete for a simple get tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds value by specifying identifier can be slug or UUID and providing example usage, which aids correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Get', resource 'full free-tier Verdict rating', and scope 'one DeFi entity'. Distinguishes from sibling tools (search_ratings, list_ratings) by implying single entity lookup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. Example provided but does not compare with siblings. Usage is implied by the tool's function.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.