Skip to main content
Glama
verdict-finance-mcp

verdict-finance-mcp

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to verdict-finance-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides DeFi vault risk analytics for AI agents to search, compare, and perform due diligence on over 700 vaults across major protocols like Morpho and Aave. It enables natural language analysis of risk scores, platform security, and portfolio-level risk assessments.
      9
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides typed onchain verdicts for EVM tokens with calibrated probabilities, enabling agents to make informed decisions on tokens such as ape, watch, or avoid, along with risk scores.
      6 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables verification of AI agent identity, authority, and integrity at transaction time, returning signed verdicts for allow, step-up, review, or block.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and agents to perform read-only lookups of dated on-record facts about agents, wallets, and endpoints, including evidence levels and history, so they can assess what is known before paying or relying on them.
      4
      621 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and apps to check URLs, domains, IP addresses, phone numbers, emails, crypto wallets, IBANs, mobile apps, and payment handles for scam, phishing, and fraud risk, returning verdicts, probabilities, facts, and reason codes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query CoinMarketCap data and receive trust-scored verdicts—ACT, CAUTION, or DO_NOT_ACT—with cross-checked evidence, RWA token assessments, trade preflight depth checks, and explanations of each check.
      6 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: search across types, get a specific entity, and list by type/filters. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tools follow a consistent 'verb_noun' pattern: search_ratings, get_rating, list_ratings.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools cover the core operations for a DeFi ratings server: search, get, and list. The number feels appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers search, detail retrieval, and listing. Missing features like rating history filters, but core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessOutdated data