xflows_get_quote

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility. It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, what the response includes, or any side effects. The phrase 'Get quote' implies read-only, but this is not explicit, and the reference to 'XFlows API, section 4' adds no behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with the action front-loaded. However, the parenthetical reference to 'XFlows API, section 4' is not meaningful to an agent and could be considered unnecessary. Overall, it is concise but not perfectly structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This tool has 10 parameters (7 required), no output schema, and no annotations. The description fails to explain what the quote returns, how to handle errors, or how it relates to xflows_build_transaction and xflows_check_status. The minimal description is inadequate for such a complex tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides descriptions for all 10 parameters, achieving 100% coverage. The description adds no additional parameter semantics, but the schema is sufficient, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get quote') and the resource ('cross-chain swap with DEX integration'). It distinguishes from simple quote tools but does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools like dex_get_swap_quote or bridge_get_quota_and_fee, so it is clear but not fully differentiating.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention call context, prerequisites, or exclusions. Only the raw purpose is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.