Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ae-hw-bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Agentic Hardware-in-the-Loop (Agentic HIL) lets coding agents develop firmware on real embedded boards: flash, reset, read UART and exchange CAN traffic, diagnose and fix. Local, policy-gated MCP tools support OpenOCD, pyOCD and STM32CubeProgrammer, with pytest for CI.
      44
      1,851 PyPI
      21
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets any MCP-capable AI and a human share a single serial port through one resident daemon, so the AI can read device output, send commands, and drive embedded boards alongside an engineer. It also performs atomic expect→send matching to win sub-second races such as U-Boot countdowns and login prompts, while keeping reads bounded for context hygiene.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Stateful MCP server for driving debug probes (J-Link) to flash, debug, and inspect embedded targets. Enables AI agents to perform flash, memory, breakpoint, and ELF/SVD-aware operations conversationally.
      41
      53 PyPI
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for simulating firmware on virtual microcontroller instances, allowing AI agents to upload, run, and read UART output from supported boards such as STM32 and Nordic.
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with serial devices via MCP tools, providing serial port discovery, connection, read/write, and status management, while sharing the same serial connection with a browser-based terminal.
      1 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools mostly target distinct actions: clearing buffer, reading buffer, sending commands, waiting for patterns, executing MicroPython, and fetching bridge info. The three console-related tools (read, send, wait) have some inherent overlap but descriptions clarify when to use each, preventing most misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case with a verb_object pattern (clear_target_console, get_bridge_info, read_target_console, run_custom_code, send_target_command, wait_for_console_pattern). No deviations in style.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a hardware bridge server; each tool covers a necessary operation (buffer management, info retrieval, console I/O, code execution, pattern waiting) without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core interactions: buffer clear/read, command send, pattern wait, code execution, and bridge info. An explicit reset tool is absent despite being mentioned in clear_target_console's description, but resets may be achievable via send_target_command or run_custom_code, leaving only a minor gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues