Skip to main content
Glama
sec-graph

sec-graph

by Vadale

Related Servers

Alternatives to sec-graph

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for persistent code exploration and diff-aware review, exposing explore and review tools to map call paths, blast radius, and generate explainable risk-scored reports.
      15 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and LLMs to query a codebase’s structure and data flow by building Joern Code Property Graphs and exposing CPGQL queries, taint tracking, program slicing, and vulnerability analysis over MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A secure, local-first MCP server for read-only inspection and troubleshooting of development environments, exposing narrow, typed, auditable capabilities for repository inspection, log summarization, Docker review, and security scanning without granting unrestricted machine access.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes read-only repository scanning across architecture, security, performance and product lenses, citation verification of findings against a working tree or git revision, and HTML/SARIF/Markdown dossier rendering as MCP tools for assistants such as Claude and Cursor.
      3
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Cursor, Claude Desktop, and Claude Code to run deterministic static-analysis tools for scanning projects, listing entry points and reachable sinks, tracing taint paths, explaining findings, and checking sanitizers without API keys or network access.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: graph exploration tools (get_community, god_nodes, graph_stats, shortest_path, query_graph, get_node, get_neighbors) and PR impact tools (list_prs, get_pr_impact, triage_prs) are clearly separated with no overlap.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow verb_noun pattern (get_community, graph_stats, list_prs, etc.), but 'god_nodes' breaks the pattern with an unclear verb. Otherwise consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools cover both graph querying and PR impact analysis without being excessive. Each tool earns its place for a knowledge graph with CI integration.

    Completeness4/5

    Graph operations are well-covered (nodes, communities, paths, stats, neighbors) and PR impact analysis is thorough. Minor gaps: no tool to update/close PRs, but triage_prs covers review priority.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues