Skip to main content
Glama
LiveSession MCP
by Uri-Rosen

load_instrument_or_effect

Destructive

Load an instrument or effect onto a specific track by URI and track index, enabling sound setup and routing in Ableton Live sessions.

Instructions

Load an instrument or effect onto a track using its URI.

Parameters:

  • track_index: The index of the track to load the instrument on

  • uri: The URI of the instrument or effect to load (e.g., 'query:Synths#Instrument%20Rack:Bass:FileId_5116')

  • user_prompt: The original user prompt that led to this tool call (for telemetry)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "track_index": "<track_index>",
      "uri": "<uri>"
    },
    "name": "load_instrument_or_effect"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
uriYes
track_indexYes
user_promptNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv2.0.0

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as non-read-only and destructive, but the description adds no behavioral context about what may be replaced or destroyed when loading onto a track. It also does not explain failure conditions, permissions, or how the output should be interpreted beyond the existing output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the action and then presents parameters in a clean list. The wording is efficient, with only minor verbosity in the telemetry note.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

It covers the required inputs adequately for a call, and the output schema handles return values. However, for a destructive tool with many overlapping siblings, it lacks guidance on URI acquisition, replacement behavior, and alternatives.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning. It does document all three parameters, including a concrete URI example and the telemetry purpose of user_prompt, though it does not clarify whether track_index is zero-based or describe URI sourcing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: load an instrument or effect onto a track using a URI. It is clear what the tool does, but it does not differentiate itself from closely related siblings such as load_browser_uri, load_plugin, insert_device, or add_effect.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. The mention of a URI implies usage, but the description does not explain when to choose this tool over load_browser_uri, load_plugin, insert_device, or add_effect.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools