Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to korean-tax-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to retrieve current Korean tax statutes, judicial precedents, and tax authority interpretations via MCP, with daily-updated legislative history and full-text search.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve Korean laws, regulations, administrative rules, legal interpretations, and precedents via official APIs for legal review workflows.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic research of Korean tax-law issues by retrieving and scoring official statutory evidence from law.go.kr and other legal sources, with citation verification and provenance, without deciding legal conclusions.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and analyze Korean law, including statutes, precedents, and ordinances, with citation verification and impact analysis.
      10
      7,773 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time search and analysis of Korean laws, legal precedents, and administrative rules through the National Law Information Center Open API, allowing AI agents to access official legal information for contract review, compliance, and legal research.
      75
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and terminal users to search Korean statutes, court precedents, administrative rules, local ordinances, treaties, and legal interpretations through 10 tools backed by 42 Ministry of Government Legislation APIs. It also supports verifying citations in AI-generated answers against the official legal sources.
      10
      7,773 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources or steps, and the descriptions actively route the agent (e.g. search_tax_rulings vs rulings_by_article vs casebook_search are explicitly differentiated by input type, and judge_options is stated to be the batch form of verify_statement). Residual overlap remains between search_tax_rulings/rulings_by_article/casebook_search and between compare_outcomes/compare_with_case, which could still cause occasional misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are consistently snake_case and readable, with a coherent domain vocabulary. However the set mixes verb_noun names (search_tax_rulings, get_tax_ruling, find_article, verify_statement, compare_outcomes, research_issue) with noun_phrase names (law_article, basic_rules, article_history, casebook_search, residency_check, timing_rules, tax_treaty), so the pattern is not fully uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 24 tools this is at the heavy edge of the acceptable band. The domain (statutes, rulings, treaties, forms, residency, verification, local PDFs) is genuinely broad and most tools earn their place, but the surface is large enough that an agent must navigate many near-adjacent options.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is unusually thorough: statute location/reading/history/addenda, ruling search/retrieval/by-article/casebook, NTS interpretive materials, treaty articles and withholding rates, forms and annexes, timing rules, plus verification and comparison tooling. The main gap is the absence of any direct tax computation or deadline/filing-calendar operation, though rate tables are reachable via search_forms.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues