toggle_flag_environment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully cover behavior. It mentions using the Unleash Admin API and the toggle action, but does not discuss side effects, idempotency, permissions, or rate limits. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: the first defines the core purpose, the second provides key usage guidance. No redundancy, front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema; the description does not explain return values or error handling. While basic usage is covered, agents lack information on what to expect after invocation, which is important for a mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameter details are already provided. The description reiterates enabling/disabling but adds little new meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'enable or disable' and the resource 'feature flag in a specific environment', providing a specific action on a distinct resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools by referencing set_flag_rollout for gradual rollouts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly instructs when not to use this tool (for gradual rollouts, use set_flag_rollout). It implies the appropriate use case (simple enable/disable), though it could explicitly state 'use for toggling entire environment'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.