remove_flag_strategy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Delete' without indicating permissions, irreversibility, or side effects on the feature flag. The description lacks important behavioral context beyond the basic operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states the main purpose, second provides a critical usage hint. No redundant or unnecessary information, making the description efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the purpose and a key prerequisite, which is adequate for a simple 4-parameter tool. However, it omits any mention of return values (no output schema) and behavioral details like destructive nature beyond the verb 'Delete'. Completeness is functional but not enriched.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all four parameters. The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond what the schema provides. It references get_flag_state for strategy IDs but does not elaborate on parameter usage. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate given schema completeness.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action 'Delete a strategy configuration from a feature flag environment' with a specific verb and resource. The mention of using get_flag_state to discover IDs distinguishes related tools and provides context for when to use this tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to use get_flag_state to discover strategy IDs before removal, which is a clear prerequisite. However, it does not specify when not to use this tool or alternative approaches, but the context is well-provided for typical use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.