alm_get_defect

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description carries burden. It describes the return format but does not disclose if read-only, permissions needed, error handling (e.g., not found), or rate limits. Adequate but could add more.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise, no wasted words. Front-loaded with purpose, followed by clear parameter and return specification. Efficient and scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, description includes return structure (defect_id and fields). Still missing error scenarios or read-only hint, but complete enough for a simple get operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema provides no description for defect_id. Description adds 'ALM numeric ID', clarifying the format and system context. Adds meaningful value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Get the full details of a defect by its ID'. The verb 'Get' and resource 'defect' are specific. Differentiates from siblings like alm_list_defects (list) and alm_update_defect (update).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implicitly indicates when to use (when you have a defect ID), but no explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives. Could mention that for listing defects use alm_list_defects or for searching use alm_search.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.