Skip to main content
Glama
UditMahaldar

HP ALM MCP Server

by UditMahaldar
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to HP ALM MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-octane-server

      prakashbsamanta
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with OpenText ALM Octane for querying, creating, and updating defects, stories, tests, and work items through natural language.
      5 npm
      MIT

    • qa-touch-mcp

      Darshitpipariya
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with the QA Touch test management API, including browsing projects, managing test cases, running tests, recording results, and filing defects.
      32
      16 npm
      MIT

    • TestRail MCP Server

      denys-ispaniuk
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with TestRail test management system, supporting full CRUD operations on projects, suites, sections, test cases, runs, results, plans, and milestones.
      35
      1,041 npm
      1
      MIT

    • TestRail MCP Server

      Derrbal
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with TestRail test management systems through comprehensive API integration. Supports retrieving and updating test cases, projects, suites, runs, and results, plus adding attachments and managing test data through natural language commands.
      18
      18 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 34 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (defects, requirements, test cases, runs, etc.), but some overlap exists between general search and specific lookups, and between single and bulk creation. Descriptions are clear enough to resolve most ambiguities.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'alm_verb_noun' pattern, e.g., 'alm_create_defect', 'alm_get_test_case'. No mixing of conventions, making the set predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    34 tools is on the high side for a typical MCP server. While ALM is complex and many operations are covered, the count feels slightly excessive, approaching the upper bound of what is reasonable.

    Completeness3/5

    Covers core CRUD for defects, test cases, runs, and requirements, but lacks delete operations entirely. Update is missing for requirements, and there is no tool to get full test set details. Several notable gaps exist.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources