Skip to main content
Glama
TravisLinkey

Provision Stack MCP

by TravisLinkey
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to Provision Stack MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • insideout-mcp

      luthersystems
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI infrastructure design agent. Describe your app in plain English; Riley designs, prices, and deploys AWS or GCP infrastructure with generated Terraform.
      24
      Apache 2.0
    • Synlake MCP Server by Synlake-ai

      Synlake MCP Serverofficial

      Synlake-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover, evaluate, and provision cloud infrastructure across AWS, GCP, and Azure with cross-cloud normalization, cost comparisons, and deployable execution kits.
      5
      5 npm
      MIT

    • Cloud Pilot MCP

      vitalemazo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with natural language control over AWS, Azure, GCP, and Alibaba Cloud infrastructure through dynamic API discovery and execution. Supports 51,900+ cloud operations and includes OpenTofu integration for complete infrastructure lifecycle management.
      3
      MIT
    • PlugLayer MCP Server by pluglayer

      PlugLayer MCP Serverofficial

      pluglayer
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deploying and managing infrastructure via natural language, including project/domain management, compute nodes, image deployment, and CI/CD integration.
      70
      MIT

    • AWS MCP Server

      lokeswaran-aj
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables management and provisioning of AWS resources like EC2, S3, and RDS using natural language prompts through the Model Context Protocol. It allows users to automate complex infrastructure tasks, such as setting up VPCs and security groups, via a chat interface.
      54
      5 npm
      27
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Suggestions.generate for options, providers.detect for provider discovery, pricing.get for component costs, credentials.list for credential checks, region.detect for region resolution, and deploy.* tools cover the full lifecycle with clear differentiation (e.g., deploy.destroy vs deploy.teardown_latest). Billing tools are separate. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent category.action pattern (noun.verb) using snake_case in the verb part (e.g., suggestions.generate, deploy.teardown_latest, billing.top_up). The pattern is uniform across the set, making it predictable for agents.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the surface is well-scoped. It covers discovery (detect, list), pricing (get, generate), deployment (run, status, destroy, list, teardown_latest), and billing (balance, top_up). No tool is extraneous, and the count feels appropriate for a provisioning domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set appears complete for the domain of provisioning cloud stacks. It covers the full workflow: initial discovery, pricing, deployment, monitoring, teardown, and billing. No obvious gaps like missing deployment modification or log retrieval, given the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources