Skip to main content
Glama
Trainzilla

Trainzilla MCP

Official
by Trainzilla
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Trainzilla MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • WorkoutGuide MCP

      amerhhh
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables workout tracking and coaching within Claude conversations, managing exercise configs, logs, streaks, and health metrics via an MCP server with PostgreSQL.
      -

    • fitness-mcp

      ikeike443
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A personal remote MCP server that lets Claude read your Hevy workout data and MacroFactor nutrition data directly in conversation, with read-only tools for workouts, body measurements, macros, and weight trends.
      MIT

    • speediance-mcp

      labatt
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets Claude read and manage Speediance Gym Monster training data — session history, per-set logs, exercise progress, rowing and heart-rate stats, custom workouts and schedule — plus a coaching memory of goals, injuries and preferences. It runs self-hosted on the user's own machine, talking directly to the user's account and keeping stored data local.
      29
      1
      MIT

    • mfp-mcp

      Mason-Levyy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connect MyFitnessPal to Claude or any MCP client. Log meals, search food database with macros, track trends, and export nutrition history against your real MyFitnessPal diary.
      2,173 PyPI
      20
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. List tools differentiate by entity (clients, check-ins, habits, etc.), create tools are specific, and calc tools serve unique purposes. No two tools have overlapping functionality, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_clients, create_habit). However, 'master_habits' and 'recent_habit_activity' deviate from the expected 'list_*' prefix, and 'whoami' is a single word, slightly breaking the pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools cover a wide range of coaching functionalities (clients, habits, plans, sessions, billing, calculations). While slightly above the typical 3-15 range, each tool serves a distinct purpose and contributes to the server's comprehensive scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is heavily skewed toward creation and listing. There are no update or delete operations for any resource (e.g., diet plans, workout plans, habits, sessions), which leaves agents unable to modify or remove existing data, creating significant workflow gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources