Skip to main content
Glama
ToxMCP

Dietary Exposure MCP

by ToxMCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Dietary Exposure MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that reproduces the results of Nikitin et al., 'Towards Explainable Computational Toxicology: Linking Antitargets to Rodent Acute Toxicity' as callable tools, enabling users to compute toxicity predictions and mechanistic analyses deterministically from a bundled dataset.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language querying of EFSA's OpenFoodTox database containing 8,006 chemical substances with toxicity data, safety assessments, risk limits, and genotoxicity studies for food additives, pesticides, and contaminants.
      9
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first nutrition MCP server for food search, barcode lookup, meal estimation, intake logging, hydration, and nutrition coaching workflows.
      46
      390
      9
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 49 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools share similar patterns (e.g., multiple export_*_review_dossier, *_signoff_packet) and could be confused without careful reading of descriptions. However, distinct resource types (contaminant, metals, adapter, trade risk) and lifecycle stages (bundle, signoff, dossier) help separate most purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a strict dietary_<verb>_<noun> pattern with consistent snake_case. Verb choices (export, assess, parse, build, lookup) are predictable and consistently applied across the toolset.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 49 tools, the server is far beyond the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. Many tools are variants of exporting or lookup operations that could be consolidated into fewer, parameterized tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers a broad dietary exposure workflow: raw data parsing, residue profiles, intake scenarios, probabilistic summaries, trade risk, and multiple export formats. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit update/delete for profiles) but core lifecycle coverage is strong.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues