Dietary Exposure MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Dietary Exposure MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving toxicological evaluations for pesticides, including Acceptable Daily Intakes, Acute Reference Doses, chemical details, and meeting conclusions.241 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that reproduces the results of Nikitin et al., 'Towards Explainable Computational Toxicology: Linking Antitargets to Rodent Acute Toxicity' as callable tools, enabling users to compute toxicity predictions and mechanistic analyses deterministically from a bundled dataset.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying EFSA's toxicological reference values for chemicals in food and feed, including hazard profiles with assessment bodies and critical endpoints, and substance search across 3,437 substances and 8,620 reference values.283 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language querying of EFSA's OpenFoodTox database containing 8,006 chemical substances with toxicity data, safety assessments, risk limits, and genotoxicity studies for food additives, pesticides, and contaminants.95MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying JECFA safety evaluations for food additives, flavourings, contaminants, and veterinary drugs, providing acceptable daily intakes, conclusions, and toxicological monographs via MCP tools.260 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for pediatric CKD nutrition and food calculations, enabling energy/protein targets, food nutrient lookup, substitutions, meal summaries, and drug-nutrient interaction checks.8-
TDQS
Scored across 49 tools
Many tools share similar patterns (e.g., multiple export_*_review_dossier, *_signoff_packet) and could be confused without careful reading of descriptions. However, distinct resource types (contaminant, metals, adapter, trade risk) and lifecycle stages (bundle, signoff, dossier) help separate most purposes.
All tools follow a strict dietary_<verb>_<noun> pattern with consistent snake_case. Verb choices (export, assess, parse, build, lookup) are predictable and consistently applied across the toolset.
With 49 tools, the server is far beyond the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. Many tools are variants of exporting or lookup operations that could be consolidated into fewer, parameterized tools.
The toolset covers a broad dietary exposure workflow: raw data parsing, residue profiles, intake scenarios, probabilistic summaries, trade risk, and multiple export formats. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit update/delete for profiles) but core lifecycle coverage is strong.