Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
ToxMCP

AOP MCP Server

by ToxMCP
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to AOP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • srj-wikidata-mcp

      srjordan6
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for maintaining specific Wikidata items (person, company, publications) with read tools and a two-step write workflow that enforces sourced, human-approved batch edits.
      -

    • tox-antitargets-mcp-server

      chemagents
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that reproduces the results of Nikitin et al., 'Towards Explainable Computational Toxicology: Linking Antitargets to Rodent Acute Toxicity' as callable tools, enabling users to compute toxicity predictions and mechanistic analyses deterministically from a bundled dataset.
      -

    • opentargets-mcp

      nickzren
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes the Open Targets Platform GraphQL API as a set of tools for querying biomedical data such as targets, diseases, drugs, and genetic evidence.
      68
      63 PyPI
      19
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 42 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The set contains multiple near-duplicate tools with overlapping purposes, especially the list_assays_for_aop vs get_assays_for_aop and list_assays_for_aops vs get_assays_for_aops pairs, plus three discover_orphan_stressors variants. An agent could easily misselect among assay discovery and draft-review/export tools despite descriptions. Some distinctions exist, but boundaries are blurred.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_aop, list_key_events, create_draft_aop), which is predictable. Some deviations like add_or_update_ke, plan_linear_draft_review_document, and trace_chemical_on_draft introduce minor inconsistency, and the list_/get_ synonym split weakens consistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    42 tools is excessive for a single domain and includes many input-variant duplicates (single vs multiple AOPs, query vs explicit) that could be consolidated. This exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many' per the rubric.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core AOP lifecycle operations: search/get AOPs, key events, KERs, assays, chemical mapping, draft creation, KE/KER editing, validation, evidence review, and export/audit. Missing delete/remove operations and draft-level metadata updates are minor gaps agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources