Stop Recording

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the annotations. idempotentHint=true is provided, and the description does not contradict it. However, it doesn't explain what happens if no recording is active or whether it also affects paused states.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, a single sentence that directly states the action. No wasted words, front-loaded with the verb.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple stop action with no parameters and annotations covering safety (idempotent, non-destructive), the description is fully sufficient. It clearly identifies the target as 'record output' and provides adequate context for an agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, and the schema reflects that. The baseline for zero parameters is 4, and the description doesn't need to add parameter info. It correctly avoids unnecessary details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Stops the record output' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly indicating the action of stopping the recording. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like obs-start-record and obs-toggle-record by naming the stop operation directly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It is implied that it stops an ongoing recording, but nothing is said about using it when not recording or comparing it to toggle-record.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.