Get Profile List
obs-get-profile-listRetrieve all available OBS profiles as an array to manage and select profiles for your streaming setup.
Instructions
Gets an array of all profiles
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
obs-get-profile-listRetrieve all available OBS profiles as an array to manage and select profiles for your streaming setup.
Gets an array of all profiles
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds the return type (array), which is consistent and provides slight additional clarity. No behavioral gaps are apparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that conveys the essential purpose without unnecessary detail. It is well-structured and easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is sufficient for a simple getter, but it lacks detail about the structure of the returned array (e.g., names, objects). Given the absence of an output schema, a bit more specificity would enhance completeness, though it remains adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, so the schema fully covers the input. The description adds no parameter information, which is acceptable since there are none. Baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: it retrieves an array of all profiles. This is specific and distinguishable from sibling tools that list other entities like inputs or scene collections.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to fetch the current profile or set a profile. It lacks explicit usage context or comparisons to other profile-related tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tom-R-Main/OBS-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server