Minehut MCP help

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavior. It says 'Show a short guide', which implies a read-only, informational action with no side effects, but it doesn't explicitly confirm that no server changes are made or describe the output format. The 'first-time setup' detail adds some content-level transparency but not full behavioral clarity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the verb and purpose. It is concise and easily scannable, though 'this server' is slightly ambiguous. It earns high marks for brevity without sacrificing the core message.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a help tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description adequately covers what it does and highlights a key component (first-time setup flow). It does not describe return format, but that is a minor gap for a help command. The description is complete enough for an agent to know when to invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so no parameter explanations are needed. The schema is empty (100% coverage), and the description already conveys that no inputs are required. With 0 params, this fits the baseline of 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states what the tool does: 'Show a short guide about how to use this server' – a specific verb ('show') and resource (guide for server usage). It differentiates from sibling operational tools like minehut_start/minehut_stop and browser tools. Mentioning the 'recommended flow for first-time setup' adds specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for help/guidance, but it does not explicitly state when to use it vs alternatives or when not to use it. A user might infer it should be called first for setup help, but this is not stated. No exclusions or alternative tool references are present.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.