set_active_layer
Activates a specific layer by name in Adobe InDesign, enabling targeted edits on that layer.
Instructions
Set the active layer
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| layerName | Yes | Layer name to activate |
Activates a specific layer by name in Adobe InDesign, enabling targeted edits on that layer.
Set the active layer
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| layerName | Yes | Layer name to activate |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention what happens if the layer does not exist, any validation, or UI focus changes. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence with no redundancy. It is concise and front-loaded, though it could include more without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple setter tool with one parameter, the description is adequate but lacks details like error behavior, side effects, or prerequisites. It meets the minimum viable standard but has gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter description. The parameter semantics are clear but not enhanced.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Set the active layer' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly stating the action. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'create_layer' or 'list_layers'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as needing to activate a layer before drawing operations. The description lacks context for usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tlechanteur/indesign-mcp-server-windows'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server