generate_policy_gate_setup

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so description must carry weight. It discloses key behaviors: requires no API key, detects MCP dependencies locally, returns YAML. Lacks details on side effects (none expected) or error cases.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences efficiently convey purpose, method, and a key constraint. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool generates YAML and has no output schema, the description adequately covers inputs and key behavioral traits. Could include more about output format, but sufficient for agent decision-making.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both params. Description adds context about defaults and purpose of repo_url, but does not significantly extend beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Generate', resource 'GitHub Actions workflow', and purpose 'enforce AgentScore Policy Gate'. It distinguishes from siblings by specifying local dependency detection and OIDC-based YAML setup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies when to use (setting up Policy Gate) and highlights that no API key or secret is required, but does not explicitly state when not to use or reference sibling alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.