No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes: scanning, checking verdicts, monitoring, policy enforcement, etc. However, 'install_policy_gate' and 'generate_policy_gate_setup' are closely related (generate vs write workflow), which could cause misselection. Also, 'check_abuse' and 'get_verdict' both return trust-related info but from different sources, which is fine.
Tools use a consistent verb_noun pattern: check_abuse, check_exposure, generate_policy_gate_setup, etc. The only minor inconsistency is 'install_policy_gate' where 'install' could be seen as more specific than 'generate', but still follows the pattern. No mixing of camelCase or other styles.
8 tools is appropriate for an MCP package security server. Each tool covers a core function: scanning, verdict, monitoring, abuse check, exposure analysis, repo check, and policy gate generation/installation. Neither too few nor too many.
The tool set covers key lifecycle operations: scan, get verdict, monitor, check abuse, check exposure, and policy enforcement (generate+install). Missing tools could include updating a verdict or removing a policy gate, but the core workflow is well-covered.