list_leaves
Retrieve a list of employee leave requests from the eyeot ERP system. Access HR leave data for management or reporting.
Instructions
Lister les demandes de congés
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve a list of employee leave requests from the eyeot ERP system. Access HR leave data for management or reporting.
Lister les demandes de congés
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits like read-only status, side effects, or permission requirements. The agent must infer it is a safe read operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise: a single phrase of four words. No wasted words, and front-loaded with the action 'Lister'. For a parameterless tool, this is appropriately sized.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is simple but complete enough to understand the tool's purpose. The term 'congés' is unambiguous in context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has zero parameters, so schema description coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter information because there are none. Per scoring rules, zero parameters yields baseline 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists leave requests ("Lister les demandes de congés"). It uses a specific verb and resource, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like list_clients or request_leave.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as request_leave. The description does not provide context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Termi24/ERP-by-Eyeot-Software'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server