dashboard_alerts
Fetch current dashboard alerts to monitor critical business events and notifications in the eyeot ERP.
Instructions
Alertes du dashboard
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Fetch current dashboard alerts to monitor critical business events and notifications in the eyeot ERP.
Alertes du dashboard
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, side effects). Completely opaque.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but at the cost of being under-specified. It is a single phrase that provides almost no useful information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description should explain what the tool returns. It does not, and the overall context is severely lacking.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, but the description adds no meaning beyond the schema. It fails to explain what alerts are returned or any context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Alertes du dashboard' is vague, lacking a verb or explicit action. It does not distinguish from the sibling tool 'dashboard_kpis'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No context about prerequisites or typical scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Termi24/ERP-by-Eyeot-Software'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server