Skip to main content
Glama
Tejas242

arxiv-mcp

by Tejas242

search_papers

Search academic papers on arXiv using query syntax. Control result count and sort by relevance or date.

Instructions

Search for academic papers on arXiv.

Args:
    query: Search query. Can use arXiv query syntax (e.g., "ti:machine learning", "au:Smith", "cat:cs.AI")
    max_results: Maximum number of results to return (1-100)
    sort_by: Sort by 'relevance', 'lastUpdatedDate', or 'submittedDate'
    sort_order: Sort order 'ascending' or 'descending'

Returns:
    Formatted list of papers matching the search criteria

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYes
max_resultsNo
sort_byNorelevance
sort_orderNodescending
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior fully. It discloses that results are a 'formatted list', but does not mention potential API delays, rate limits, or pagination behavior, which are relevant for an external service call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (5 lines) with a clear 'Args' and 'Returns' structure. Every sentence adds value, and the purpose is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description's 'Formatted list of papers' is adequate but vague. It mentions query syntax, sorting, and limits, which is sufficient for a search tool, though error handling or empty results could be noted.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% coverage (no descriptions), but the description adds clear meaning for all 4 parameters: query with arXiv syntax examples, max_results range, sort_by and sort_order options. This fully compensates for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Search for academic papers on arXiv' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like search_by_author and search_by_category by omitting field-specific language, making it clear this is a general search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides usage hints for query syntax but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives like search_by_author or build_advanced_query. The agent must infer from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tejas242/arxiv-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server