build_advanced_query

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It does not mention whether the tool is read-only, safe, or idempotent. While the tool is clearly a query builder with no side effects, the lack of explicit behavioral information is a gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a well-structured docstring with Args and Returns sections. Every sentence provides necessary information: purpose, parameter descriptions, and return value. There is no redundant or extraneous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters but no output schema, the description adequately covers all parameters and the return type. It explains the tool's purpose (building a query) and what the output is (a string for search_papers). For a query-building tool, this is complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, meaning the schema provides no parameter meanings. The description compensates by listing each parameter (title_keywords, author_name, etc.) with concise explanations like 'Keywords to search in paper titles'. This adds significant meaning beyond the schema's bare type information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the function is to build an advanced search query using multiple fields, and specifies the return value as a query string for use with search_papers. This provides a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes it from sibling tools that perform searches directly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when constructing complex queries with multiple fields, and mentions the output can be used with search_papers. However, it does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like direct search_papers calls, nor does it mention exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.