Submit a URL batch to Bing

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds context that the daily and monthly quota is checked first, and that URLs must be same-site and public. Annotations declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, and the description adds a validation step and quota behavior beyond these. It doesn't describe response/return format or error behavior on failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler. Each sentence earns its place: the first states what/how it submits, the second states a behavioral constraint (quota check ordering). Highly front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-param, no-nested-object tool with 100% schema coverage, the description covers purpose, constraints, and quota behavior. It could mention failure handling or the response structure, but with full schema coverage and a simple mutation tool, it's reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters (site_url, urls) are documented in the schema. The description adds the 'same-site', 'public', and '500' constraints that reinforce but don't deeply extend the schema. It references bing_list_sites for the exact site_url value, which is a useful cross-tool pointer, keeping this at baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states a specific action (validate and submit up to 500 same-site public URLs) via a named route ('SubmitUrlbatch'). It clearly distinguishes from siblings like bing_submit_url (single URL) and bing_submit_sitemap by specifying batch submission with a count limit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description states parameters (same-site public URLs) and the limit (500) plus quota checking. It doesn't explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it, but the sibling set makes the batch-vs-single distinction clear from the title alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.