Create Standard Audit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only says 'crawls HTML', lacking details on destructive nature, rate limits, authentication, or what happens to the environment. The name 'create' suggests mutation, but no confirmation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, clear and to the point. The prefix 'Data Tool:' is unnecessary but not harmful. It could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 3 parameters and a nested settings object with many fields, and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not cover what the audit report looks like, required steps, or expected outcomes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning to parameters beyond the schema. It does not explain how settings affect the audit, which could be valuable for a nested object with many fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it launches a standard website audit that crawls HTML. It distinguishes from the sibling 'DATA_createAdvancedAudit' by noting suitability for static and server-side rendered sites, implying the advanced version is for dynamic sites.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives guidance on when to use this tool ('Suitable for most static and server-side rendered sites'), implying not for dynamic sites. It does not explicitly mention alternatives but the sibling name creates context. A clearer when-not-to-use would improve.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.