flomo-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@flomo-mcpadd a note: testing flomo integration"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
flomo-mcp MCP Server
flomo-mcp
一个基于 MCP(Model Context Protocol)的服务,将文本快速发布到 flomo。
功能特性
提供
write_note工具:把文本作为一条 flomo 笔记发布提供资源/提示示例:示例 notes 资源、
summarize_notes提示
安装与构建
克隆仓库
安装依赖:
npm install构建:
npm run build
配置
以环境变量或启动参数设置 Flomo Webhook:
环境变量:
FLOMO_API_URL="https://flomoapp.com/iwh/xxx/yyy/"启动参数:
--flomo_api_url=https://flomoapp.com/iwh/xxx/yyy/
在 Cursor 中使用
打开
~/.cursor/mcp.json,新增:
{
"mcpServers": {
"flomo-mcp": {
"command": "/absolute/path/to/node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/flomo-mcp/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"FLOMO_API_URL": "https://flomoapp.com/iwh/xxx/yyy/"
}
}
}
}在 Cursor 侧边栏 MCP 中启用
flomo-mcp调用工具
write_note,传入:
{ "content": "今天开发了一个 MCP 服务器,很开心记录一下" }本地调试(可选)
运行 Inspector:
npm run inspector交互测试资源、提示与工具
许可协议
本项目使用 MIT License,详见
LICENSE
贡献
欢迎 PR/Issue,提交前请:
代码通过
npm run build不要提交
build/、node_modules/、私密信息
write notes to flomo
This is a TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system. It demonstrates core MCP concepts by providing:
Resources representing text notes with URIs and metadata
Tools for creating new notes
Prompts for generating summaries of notes
Related MCP server: flomo-mcp-server
Features
Resources
List and access notes via
note://URIsEach note has a title, content and metadata
Plain text mime type for simple content access
Tools
create_note- Create new text notesTakes title and content as required parameters
Stores note in server state
Prompts
summarize_notes- Generate a summary of all stored notesIncludes all note contents as embedded resources
Returns structured prompt for LLM summarization
Development
Install dependencies:
npm installBuild the server:
npm run buildFor development with auto-rebuild:
npm run watchInstallation
To use with Claude Desktop, add the server config:
On MacOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
On Windows: %APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"flomo-mcp": {
"command": "/path/to/flomo-mcp/build/index.js"
}
}
}Debugging
Since MCP servers communicate over stdio, debugging can be challenging. We recommend using the MCP Inspector, which is available as a package script:
npm run inspectorThe Inspector will provide a URL to access debugging tools in your browser.
Available Tools
1 toolwrite_noteB
Write note to flomo
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| content | Yes | Text content of the note |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Write note to flomo' without mentioning authentication requirements, side effects, or success/failure behavior, leaving significant ambiguity for an agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and easily parsed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is arguably sufficient for basic invocation, but it lacks contextual details about the flomo service or expected behavior. It is adequate but leaves room for improvement.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema provides a complete description of the single 'content' parameter, and the description adds no additional syntax or usage details. With 100% schema coverage, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a clear verb ('Write') and a specific resource ('note to flomo'), making the tool's function immediately understandable. With no sibling tools, it doesn't need differentiation, though 'flomo' may be an unfamiliar service to some users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. It simply states the action without context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v0.1.1- First observed
write_note
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of overlap or confusion between tools. The intent is unambiguous.
The single tool name 'write_note' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and predictable even with only one tool present.
With only one tool, the server feels very thin for a Flomo integration. A typical note-taking service would require multiple operations (e.g., read, update, delete), so the small count is likely a limitation rather than a deliberate scope.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for the stated purpose. Only 'write_note' (create) is available, with no way to retrieve, update, list, or delete notes, leaving obvious dead ends for any real workflow.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Markdown-based note-taking with a hosted MCP server. Your notes serve you and your AI.
Connect AI to your flomo notes. Search, create, edit notes and manage tags via MCP.
Google Keep-style notes app with an MCP server for AI agents to read/write notes.
Notes, files, GitHub, and Drive through one MCP connection.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that enables users to write text notes directly to Flomo from Claude.111457MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for flomo that enables AI tools to quickly add notes to your flomo account via the API.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMinimal MCP server for sending messages to Poke via the inbound webhook.118MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for sending notifications to ntfy.sh or self-hosted ntfy instances.19MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TaylorChen/flomo-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server