Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to PsyFlow-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      FastMCP is a comprehensive MCP server allowing secure and standardized data and functionality exposure to LLM applications, offering resources, tools, and prompt management for efficient LLM interactions.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that enables intelligent tool management and semantic search for APIs using sentence-transformers. It supports both REST and MCP interfaces across dual transport modes, allowing users to upload, manage, and query API tools with natural language.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server framework featuring dynamic tool loading and automatic tool discovery from a dedicated directory. It leverages FastMCP to provide a robust environment for building, configuring, and testing individual Python-based tools.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    C2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct in purpose, with clear separation between task-related operations (build, download, list) and voice/list functions. However, 'localize' is somewhat ambiguous—it could relate to tasks or voices, creating minor potential for confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case, such as 'build_task', 'list_tasks', and 'list_voices'. This uniformity makes the set predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for a specialized domain like task and voice management. The count is neither too sparse nor bloated, allowing focused functionality without overwhelming complexity.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers basic operations for tasks (build, download, list) and voices (list), but lacks update or delete tools, which are common in lifecycle management. This creates notable gaps that agents might need to work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues