Skip to main content
Glama
TIGERwu0118

paper-download-mcp

by TIGERwu0118

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
paper_download_healthA

Report version, staging dir, provider availability.

Never prints API keys or credentials.

paper_download_list_providersA

List available download providers and their status.

paper_download_probeB

Probe whether a provider can likely fetch the given identifier.

Args: identifier: DOI (e.g. 10.1016/j.x) or UT. provider_hint: If given, only this provider is considered.

paper_download_fetchA

Fetch a paper into the staging area; return artifact metadata.

Does NOT accept project, output_dir, year, publisher, or final filename. The caller moves the verified artifact to final storage.

Args: identifier: DOI or UT. provider_hint: Preferred provider name (hard constraint if given).

paper_download_verify_artifactA

Verify a staged artifact: existence, PDF validity, page count, hash.

paper_download_discard_artifactC

Remove a staged artifact from the staging area.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clear, distinct role in the fetch→verify→discard workflow, plus provider/system introspection. Fetch and probe are differentiated by actual download vs. likelihood check, and health versus list_providers is similarly distinct.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools share the paper_download_ prefix and use snake_case, but most follow a verb_noun pattern while paper_download_health uses a noun. The overall convention is still predictable and readable.

Tool Count5/5

With six tools covering fetch, discard, probe, health, provider listing, and verification, the count is well-scoped for a focused paper-download staging service. Each tool earns its place and there is no bloat.

Completeness4/5

The core lifecycle of fetching, verifying, discarding, and probing is covered, and provider/health introspection is present. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to list currently staged artifacts, though the workflow is still usable without it.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues