paper-download-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to paper-download-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for downloading academic papers from multiple sources using intelligent routing and year-aware priority selection. It enables users to retrieve metadata and download single or batch PDFs by DOI or URL.336 PyPI3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for downloading academic papers from DOI or title, resolving references, and generating citations. Supports batch downloads, multiple mirrors, and optional Unpaywall integration.112MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude Code and Codex to drive a local literature-retrieval workflow: import DOIs or references, find and download legal open-access full texts first, submit requests through the user's own personal account when needed, and monitor or verify the resulting PDFs.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that resolves paper requests (DOI, arXiv, etc.), checks a local store, fetches open-access PDFs, and returns request IDs. It integrates with acatome-extract for ingestion and provides tools for submission, status, update, and file upload.425 PyPIGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA provider-neutral Web Search MCP server and CLI that combines live search, scholarly discovery, verified PDF downloads, URL normalization, multi-provider ranking, secure page fetching, caching, and citation-ready research evidence.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables locally-first literature research through an MCP host by collecting sources, parsing documents, retrieving evidence, validating citations, and exporting research records in multiple formats.38MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clear, distinct role in the fetch→verify→discard workflow, plus provider/system introspection. Fetch and probe are differentiated by actual download vs. likelihood check, and health versus list_providers is similarly distinct.
All tools share the paper_download_ prefix and use snake_case, but most follow a verb_noun pattern while paper_download_health uses a noun. The overall convention is still predictable and readable.
With six tools covering fetch, discard, probe, health, provider listing, and verification, the count is well-scoped for a focused paper-download staging service. Each tool earns its place and there is no bloat.
The core lifecycle of fetching, verifying, discarding, and probing is covered, and provider/health introspection is present. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to list currently staged artifacts, though the workflow is still usable without it.