Skip to main content
Glama
TIGERwu0118

paper-download-mcp

by TIGERwu0118

Related Servers

Alternatives to paper-download-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for downloading academic papers from multiple sources using intelligent routing and year-aware priority selection. It enables users to retrieve metadata and download single or batch PDFs by DOI or URL.
      3
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for downloading academic papers from DOI or title, resolving references, and generating citations. Supports batch downloads, multiple mirrors, and optional Unpaywall integration.
      2
      11
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that resolves paper requests (DOI, arXiv, etc.), checks a local store, fetches open-access PDFs, and returns request IDs. It integrates with acatome-extract for ingestion and provides tools for submission, status, update, and file upload.
      4
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A provider-neutral Web Search MCP server and CLI that combines live search, scholarly discovery, verified PDF downloads, URL normalization, multi-provider ranking, secure page fetching, caching, and citation-ready research evidence.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for searching scientific papers, retrieving metadata and abstracts, and legally downloading Open Access PDFs via OpenAlex, CrossRef, and Unpaywall APIs.
      5
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables provenance-first scholarly retrieval, paper ingestion, and reproducible research workflows by searching academic and developer sources, extracting source-located facts and claims, and preserving evidence and provider uncertainty for MCP clients.
      37
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct role in the fetch→verify→discard workflow, plus provider/system introspection. Fetch and probe are differentiated by actual download vs. likelihood check, and health versus list_providers is similarly distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the paper_download_ prefix and use snake_case, but most follow a verb_noun pattern while paper_download_health uses a noun. The overall convention is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With six tools covering fetch, discard, probe, health, provider listing, and verification, the count is well-scoped for a focused paper-download staging service. Each tool earns its place and there is no bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle of fetching, verifying, discarding, and probing is covered, and provider/health introspection is present. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to list currently staged artifacts, though the workflow is still usable without it.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues