startmining-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to startmining-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying live proof-of-work mining data — solo-mining odds, cost of production, network state, hardware profitability, and news — through keyless MCP tools backed by a public upstream endpoint.301 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides live Bitcoin network data (fees, mempool, hashrate) and AI-powered price/fee forecasts via MCP tools, with free access to basic data and pay-per-call for advanced features.1783 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides real Bitcoin full node data via 17 tools, with pay-per-call in USDC on Base mainnet. Free tools include blockchain info, fees, and mempool; paid tools enable transaction tracking, address analysis, and more.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to access live mining data for 126+ proof-of-work networks and 770+ hardware models, including network difficulty, hashrate, solo-mining odds, cost of production, hardware profitability, and mining news.6MIT

BackPow PoW Oracleofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLive Proof-of-Work mining data for AI agents: difficulty, hashrate, solo-mining odds, cost of production and hardware profitability across 126+ networks and 770+ ASIC/GPU/CPU models. Sourced and timestamped, read-only.649 npm1MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server offering 26 Lightning-paid tools for Bitcoin mempool intelligence and sovereign on-prem AI inference, with no third-party APIs and pay-per-call in sats.2616 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools target distinct resources (mempool, ASIC prices, halving, recent blocks), and descriptions cross-reference alternatives like get_weekly_stats. However, get_market_data bundles price/hashprice/difficulty/network stats and overlaps with get_hashprice, get_difficulty, and get_price_history, creating some selection ambiguity.
Every tool follows a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_* or calculate_*. The convention is completely predictable across all 13 tools.
13 tools is well within the ideal range and each covers a meaningful slice of the mining-analytics domain (current stats, historical series, profitability calcs). Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.
The surface covers current data (difficulty, hashprice, mempool, market), history (price, difficulty, weekly/monthly aggregates, blocks), and calculators (profitability, breakeven), which is strong lifecycle coverage. Minor gaps remain, e.g. no historical profitability or per-pool/miner comparison, but core workflows are supported.