startmining-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to startmining-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides live Bitcoin network data (fees, mempool, hashrate) and AI-powered price/fee forecasts via MCP tools, with free access to basic data and pay-per-call for advanced features.1745 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides real Bitcoin full node data via 17 tools, with pay-per-call in USDC on Base mainnet. Free tools include blockchain info, fees, and mempool; paid tools enable transaction tracking, address analysis, and more.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to access live mining data for 126+ proof-of-work networks and 770+ hardware models, including network difficulty, hashrate, solo-mining odds, cost of production, hardware profitability, and mining news.6MIT

BackPow PoW Oracleofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLive Proof-of-Work mining data for AI agents: difficulty, hashrate, solo-mining odds, cost of production and hardware profitability across 126+ networks and 770+ ASIC/GPU/CPU models. Sourced and timestamped, read-only.635 npm1MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server offering 26 Lightning-paid tools for Bitcoin mempool intelligence and sovereign on-prem AI inference, with no third-party APIs and pay-per-call in sats.264 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying public Bitcoin network data including fees, mempool status, hashrate, transactions, address stats, and Lightning network information without requiring API keys.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools target distinct resources (mempool, ASIC prices, halving, recent blocks), and descriptions cross-reference alternatives like get_weekly_stats. However, get_market_data bundles price/hashprice/difficulty/network stats and overlaps with get_hashprice, get_difficulty, and get_price_history, creating some selection ambiguity.
Every tool follows a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_* or calculate_*. The convention is completely predictable across all 13 tools.
13 tools is well within the ideal range and each covers a meaningful slice of the mining-analytics domain (current stats, historical series, profitability calcs). Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.
The surface covers current data (difficulty, hashprice, mempool, market), history (price, difficulty, weekly/monthly aggregates, blocks), and calculators (profitability, breakeven), which is strong lifecycle coverage. Minor gaps remain, e.g. no historical profitability or per-pool/miner comparison, but core workflows are supported.