goal_state

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description clearly labels the tool as a 'read' operation, implying no side effects. Without annotations, it provides good behavioral context, though it could explicitly confirm its read-only nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no extraneous words. The first sentence states the core purpose, and the second lists replacements. Efficient and informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a single parameter and no output schema, the description covers all aspects it intends to retrieve. It could mention the output format but is still adequate for the agent to understand the tool's scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter is goal_id, and the description clarifies it is used to identify the goal for the read. Despite 0% schema coverage, the description adds sufficient meaning, though a more detailed format hint would be better.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it is a 'comprehensive single-goal read' and lists the specific aspects covered (details, quality, progress, etc.). It explicitly names the tools it replaces, clearly distinguishing from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates it replaces multiple tools, suggesting it should be used for a holistic read. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention any prerequisites or side effects.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.