Skip to main content
Glama
TAgents

Planning System MCP Server

by TAgents
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Planning System MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Roadmap

      withvibe
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI orchestrators to manage hierarchical implementation roadmaps with phases, tasks, and plan-change tracking.
      Apache 2.0

    • Helios-9 MCP Server

      jakedx6
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive project management capabilities through the Helios-9 API, enabling AI agents to create and manage projects, tasks, initiatives, and documents with full hierarchy support and AI-optimized metadata.
      65
      11 npm
      2
      MIT

    • agent-task-planner

      xici001
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to decompose high-level goals into structured task plan DAGs with dependencies, acceptance criteria, and quality gates, and to validate or export those plans in multiple formats.
      MIT

    • project-tasks-mcp

      augustoOliveira1993
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables managing projects, features, tasks, dependencies, executions, and human review through a Streamable HTTP endpoint, along with persistent inter-agent cooperation via task messaging and event subscriptions. It also supports administrative actions such as approvals, cancellations, unblocking, and member management.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., create_goal vs derive_subgoal, update_task vs update_node), but some overlap exists (e.g., add_learning vs queue_decision for recording, briefing vs goal_state for read). Descriptions help differentiate, but with 37 tools, occasional confusion is possible.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_goal, update_task, list_plans). Even compound verbs like claim_next_task and propose_research_chain fit the pattern. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    37 tools is quite high for a single server, covering goals, plans, tasks, workspaces, knowledge, decisions, and collaboration. While each tool serves a specific need, the number feels heavy and may overwhelm agents, though it is justified by the broad domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers core CRUD for goals, plans, tasks, and workspaces, plus knowledge and decision management. However, gaps exist: no list_members (only invite/remove/update), no update_workspace, and no tool to view all pending decisions. These missing features may cause friction.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources