A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI orchestrators to manage hierarchical implementation roadmaps with phases, tasks, and plan-change tracking.
Apache 2.0
Planning System MCP Server
by TAgents
Related Servers
Alternatives to Planning System MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceProvides comprehensive project management capabilities through the Helios-9 API, enabling AI agents to create and manage projects, tasks, initiatives, and documents with full hierarchy support and AI-optimized metadata.6517 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to decompose high-level goals into structured task plan DAGs with dependencies, acceptance criteria, and quality gates, and to validate or export those plans in multiple formats.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceHelps AI agents decompose goals into costed execution plans, checkpoint progress with deviation tracking, and learn from past project data.31 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage projects, tasks, and schedules in JJ Planner through CRUD operations.25 npm-
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI agents to track and manage product development projects through structured 7-phase lifecycles with sprint tracking, role-based collaboration, and multi-project support. Provides phase management, progress tracking, and team coordination tools for complete product development workflows.-
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 37 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., create_goal vs derive_subgoal, update_task vs update_node), but some overlap exists (e.g., add_learning vs queue_decision for recording, briefing vs goal_state for read). Descriptions help differentiate, but with 37 tools, occasional confusion is possible.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_goal, update_task, list_plans). Even compound verbs like claim_next_task and propose_research_chain fit the pattern. No mixing of conventions.
Tool Count3/5
37 tools is quite high for a single server, covering goals, plans, tasks, workspaces, knowledge, decisions, and collaboration. While each tool serves a specific need, the number feels heavy and may overwhelm agents, though it is justified by the broad domain.
Completeness3/5
The toolset covers core CRUD for goals, plans, tasks, and workspaces, plus knowledge and decision management. However, gaps exist: no list_members (only invite/remove/update), no update_workspace, and no tool to view all pending decisions. These missing features may cause friction.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues